You deserve better from your investment advisor
Christopher Norwood • September 6, 2022

 Financial Advisor RED FLAGS












Market Update

The S&P 500 lost 3.3% last week to close at 3924.26. The Nasdaq fell 4.2% and the Dow dropped 3.0%. the S&P is down 17% on the year. The Dow is down 13% and the Nasdaq is down 25%. The stock market is less expensive than at the start of 2022, but it still isn’t cheap. What's more, negative earnings revisions are higher than normal for the third quarter. Analysts have lowered S&P 500 earnings estimates by 5.4% in the first two months of Q3. The average decline for the first two months of a quarter has been 1.9% over the last five years, according to FactSet. Falling earnings estimates make the market more expensive.


The long-term and short-term trends are down. The 200-day moving average has been declining for 90 consecutive trading days. The odds favor a continued decline, according to Dean Christians of Sundial Capital Research. The S&P 500 has lost an average of 5.8% over six months after the 200-day MA declines 90 days in a row. Ninety consecutive declining days for the 200-day have occurred 23 times since 1930.


Eight market strategists recently polled by Barron’s provided an average target of 4185 for the S&P 500 by year-end. Individual estimates ranged from 3600 to 4800. It is a wide range given there are only four months left in the year. The wide range speaks to a high degree of uncertainty surrounding earnings and interest rates.


The S&P 500 has retraced 62.8% of its rally from the June low. The market bounced off that Fibonacci number on Thursday and Friday. It needs to hold the Fibonacci support in the coming week, or the odds favor a retest of the 17 June low. The 3636 June low is 7.3% away. Earnings estimates are falling. The Federal Reserve is tightening, and the technical picture is negative. The path of least resistance is still down.


Economic Indicators

Economic indicators last week show a slowly growing economy heading into the fall. The Chicago manufacturing PMI increased to 52.2 in August from 52.1 the prior month. The S&P U.S. manufacturing PMI was revised higher to 51.5 in August from an initial 51.3. Construction spending declined less in July falling 0.4% after falling 0.5% the prior month. ISM manufacturing in August held steady at 52.8%. Consumer confidence is improving. The consumer confidence index rose to 103.2 in August from 95.7 the prior month. Rising consumer confidence bodes well for the holiday shopping season. A negative, factory orders fell 1.0% in July after climbing 1.8% in June.


Leading indicators from prior weeks point to more slowing in the economy. A slowing economy should continue to reduce inflationary pressures. A reduction is needed. The headline numbers, both CPI and PCE, remain far too high. Negative productivity numbers and high unit labor costs spell trouble by adding to inflationary pressures and causing profit margin compression. Second quarter unit labor costs rose 10.2%. Companies can either eat the higher unit labor costs or raise prices.


As well, home prices are still rising rapidly. The latest S&P Case-Shiller U.S. Home price index showed an 18.0% increase year-over-year for June. It was down from a 19.9% increase the prior month. Rapidly rising home prices feed into inflation numbers, making a quick fall in inflation less likely.


The jobs market remained strong in August although jobs are a lagging indicator. Job openings rose to 11.2 million in June from 11.0 million the prior month. The Quits rate did fall to 4.2 million from 4.3 million. The Quits rate indicates how workers feel about the jobs market. A higher Quits rate indicates confidence in the ability to find another job.


Overall last week’s economic data continued to point to slow economic growth. It also pointed to sticky inflationary pressures. The Federal Reserve is in an unenviable position as we head into the last four months of the year.


Many Financial Advisors Don’t Earn Their Fees and Commissions

I’ve been associated with the financial advisor business since the mid-90s. That’s almost 30 years of watching and participating. One of the things I’ve come to believe is that most financial advisors don’t earn their fees. A second is that most financial advisors don’t provide much actual financial advice. A third is that many financial advisors know very little about investing. Those three things overlap of course.


I’m going to share parts of an email from a friend about a financial advisor meeting in which he participated. I’m also going to share some of my responses to his email.


My friend wrote at the start of his email, “You were right. Couldn’t really get a straight answer on most things.” One of the things he couldn’t get a straight answer on was how the advisor was compensated. The advisor was claiming that he was charging 1% on a $1.2 million portfolio (which is too much). The advisor told him that his compensation was capped at 1% even though he did use some loaded mutual funds and proprietary products. Companies make money from proprietary products. They incentivize their advisors to sell those products. It is unlikely the advisor is using loaded funds and proprietary products but not benefiting. My friend left the meeting uncertain about compensation. It is a red flag when an advisor has trouble explaining compensation.


Performance was another unsatisfying area of discussion. My friend wanted to see how the advisor’s recommendations were doing against appropriate benchmarks. The advisor’s response was that the investment choices were the clients. My friend wrote, “The biggest issue is that he wanted to stand behind the idea that these were Brian’s choices and as such don’t need to be measured against any type of performance benchmark.” There are a few things to unpack from that statement. First and foremost, it isn’t true. Brian is not making the choices when it comes to specific investments. The advisor is making those choices. And that leads to the second observation. Those choices should be compared to similar investments to determine if the advisor is adding value or not. You shouldn’t be paying an advisor for mutual fund selection unless those funds outperform.


The advisor also had this to say about benchmarking, “The benchmark is Brian’s goal of lifetime income.” More nonsense. Calculating total spending goals is part of financial planning. Benchmarking a portfolio is portfolio management. Benchmarking a portfolio is about measuring performance against alternatives. It isn't about determining lifetime spending goals. The advisor was giving a non-answer.

My friend also got the run around on asset allocation. Brian had about 9% of his portfolio in non-U.S. stocks. The advisor claimed he was not underinvested in non-U.S. stocks but didn’t provide a rationale to support that claim. In comparison Vanguard's 2030 target date fund has 40% of stock exposure in non-U.S. stocks. Fidelity's 2030 target date fund has 50% of stock exposure in non-U.S. stocks.

At one point in the conversation the advisor pinned the underexposure on his client. He claimed that it was Brian’s choice how much international stock he owned. One of an advisor's most important jobs is to help clients with asset allocations. An advisor who isn’t helping with asset allocations isn’t doing their job and shouldn’t be getting paid.


My friend also heard the typical double-speak when he asked about active management. Active management requires making decisions about what to own. Stock picking involves active management. Overweighting and underweighting different sectors and industries requires active management. The advisor’s response to questions about active management was, “we aren’t trying to time the market. I don’t know anyone who has successfully done that consistently.”


Of course, market timing is different than active management. Market timing involves being in the market or out of the market. The $1.2 million portfolio was full of actively managed mutual funds. Actively managed funds are trying to beat their benchmarks. It's why you pay more for them than for index funds. The advisor was saying that active management doesn’t work. He labeled it market timing. At the same time, he was using actively managed funds for Brian’s portfolio. Inconsistent to say the least. If active management equals market timing and market timing doesn’t work, then why is the advisor using actively managed mutual funds?


It's a sad commentary on our profession that individuals like this advisor are allowed to be financial advisors. The lack of competency is depressing yet all too common. Investors who use financial advisors should expect much more from them.


Regards,


Christopher R Norwood, CFA


Chief Market Strategist

By Christopher Norwood February 17, 2025
Executive Summary The S&P finished the week at 6,114.69 The 2-year yield hit 4.38% after the Consumer Price Index (CPI) was released on Wednesday, but ended the week at 4.27% Investors dumped stocks when the CPI report was released Producer Price Index (PPI) has accelerated for five straight months PPI is a leading indicator of consumer inflation Inflation expectations are rising among fixed-income investors The 5- &10-year breakevens are rising The Stock Market
By Christopher Norwood February 10, 2025
Executive Summary The S&P finished the week at 6025.99 The S&P has been trading sideways since 11 November Volatility (VIX) has spiked five times since last fall each time falling quickly back to mid-teen levels Microsoft, Alphabet, and Amazon have contributed to the negative tone with cautious guidance The Equity Risk Premium has been falling over the last 14 years Bonds have been a horrible investment over the last three, five, and ten years The jobs market continues to show strength Consumers' inflation expectations are increasing The stock market is expensive and will return less than its long-term average over the next decade Good stock picking will be critical if investors are to earn a return close to the long run average. The equity risk premium is too low which may make Treasury bonds a better investment than stocks on a risk adjusted basis over the next decade. Treasury bonds may outperform stocks over the next decade but not necessarily over the next few years since the 10-Year could rise another 100 basis points in the short term. The Stock Market
By Christopher Norwood February 3, 2025
Executive Summary The S&P fell 1% last week, closing Friday at 6,040.53 The index hasn’t been able to break clear of resistance The AI space took a big hit Monday Tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China GDP grew 2.3% annually in Q4 The futures market expected the funds rate to remain at 4.25-4.50% and it did The employment cost index (ECI) for Q4 2024 rose 0.9% QoQ Pending home sales took a hit in December The stock market continues to trend higher There is a relationship between the stock market and the economy More Interesting Charts to review 
By Christopher Norwood January 27, 2025
Executive Summary The S&P hit a new high on Thursday, reaching 6,128.18. The Volatility Index (VIX) fell to a low of 14.85 The VIX has declined sharply from 27.6 The 5.4% decline from 6 December to 13 January doesn’t qualify as a correction Watch Earnings, Inflation, and Interest Rates for the stock market's near-term direction Don't miss the Charts Worth Seeing at the bottom
By Christopher Norwood January 20, 2025
Executive Summary The stock market's best week since Donald Trump’s re-election in November The S&P 500 rose 2.91% The CME FedWatch tool is predicting one cut in 2025 The fundamental narrative was all about inflation Earnings season is in full swing starting this week Higher than-expected interest rates and inflation might put downward pressure on stocks. Inflation expectations have been rising 2025 is likely to be a volatile year for the capital markets Deglobalization means higher inflation
By Christopher Norwood January 13, 2025
Executive Summary The jobs report on Friday sparked stock and bond market selling Economic data hasn't justified rate cuts The Bond market has been signaling its disagreement with the Fed since the September cut The 10-year Treasury Yield is rising. Bond investors see inflation risks The Jobs market is strong Disinflation is slowing Investors should expect more volatility in 2025 Diversification means less portfolio volatility but also lower returns True diversification means always owning something that is underperforming  Diversified portfolios will trail during a bull market
By Christopher Norwood January 6, 2025
Executive Summary The Santa Claus rally was a no-show this year Friday's jobs report might bring volatility Economic data continues to point toward a strong economy The stock market is near all-time highs Corporate bond spreads are near record tights Liquidity is abundant No signs of a recession. The Fed is backing away from aggressive rate cuts. Inflation concerns are re-emerging  2024 in Review
By Christopher Norwood December 23, 2024
Executive Summary The Stock Market dropped 2% last week The Dow ended its losing streak at 10 The Fed cut interest rates by a quarter-point last Wednesday Fewer rate cuts could mean slower economic growth and slower earnings growth Apollo’s chief economist Torsten Sløk predicts a 40% chance of Fed rate hikes in 2025 Value stocks continue to lag growth stocks and the overall market Value will make a comeback. It always does. History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes~ Mark Twain
By Christopher Norwood December 16, 2024
Executive Summary 50-years of S&P 500 data The Dow ended Friday on a seven-day losing streak 96% chance the Fed will cut by 0.25% this week Stock market strategists are expecting more S&P 500 gains in 2025 Value Investing Outperforms over the Long Run Value can be found in international and emerging markets today Value can be found in the U.S. stock market, but it takes patience
By Christopher Norwood December 9, 2024
Executive Summary Jobless claims report higher than forecast The Cboe Volatility Index (VIX) fell to 12.77, that's low Why is the Fed cutting at all? The S&P likely to finish the year above its current level The 10-year & 2-year Treasury yield are falling The Fed continues cutting despite a strong jobs market and high inflation Investors should look at the “low-flyer” companies that represent better value Mental Accounting and Risk 
More Posts
Share by: